Posts

There's a *Lot of Love* in This Room!

Message ID: 393906 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-08-04 10:26:14 Subject: There's a *Lot of Love* in this room!!! Recs: 0 BahDuhBahDuh Dump BadahBump BadahBump BadahBump BadahBump etc! Wow! Now Wally is supposed to be DDT?! I don't mind saying that that is both the most retarded and amusing thing I've read here in a long time! Also, I haven't heard the "Bar used his *sorcery* to force Andy to change Yahouvre!" bull shit in *ages*! It must be a Classic Crock Weekend! GEEZUS! ... SWEET BABY GEEZUS! Kids: it's a *message board*! You know: little pixels forming vowels, consonants and punctuation! So Zen got canned. So what? How is Wally suddenly responsible for it, and how does this make him DDT?! That's *idiotic* unfocused acrimony. Wally didn't even report Zen for abuse. Other people did. Apparently enough that Yahoo stopped him. Big Deal. You've seen them once, you've seen them a hundred times. ...

Umm, see you in the funny papers

Message ID: 393016 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-26 15:48:09 Subject: Umm, see you in the funny papers Recs: 0 I was going to cross post something I put on IV about being too busy to be around for the next several weeks, but why bother? Quick! Someone bump up the Colonel's posts! Quick! Someone whine about it! Quick! Time for a rating war! What a shithole. The whole idea of 'negative rating' is just idiotic. Now, you can't simply ignore idiots, you must rate them down! You know damn well they're gonna do it to you! it made more sense to simply rec the posts you liked. A range of 1 to 5 is totally inadequate. Whatever... I'm going to be far to busy for this dump or any other time wasting places for a good while, so.... Good effin' riddance, Yahoo. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Messag...

SCOX desperate, blows own toes off!

Message ID: 392230 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-18 13:22:00 Subject: SCOX Desperate, Blows Own Toes Off!!!! Recs: 0 In a desperate legal gambit, SCOX attorneys have taken to self mutilation in response to the brutal mugging they suffered in Judge Wells' decision, which gutted 2/3rds of their suit against IBM. Their response appears to be calculated to invoke yet more wrath from the judge, as *each and every section in the TOC* of their filing starts with "The Judge erred..."!!! A Noted Footgun Expert was overheard to say: "*Whistle*! That's some gawdamn nice shootin'!" ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ---------------------------------------...

We're at Investor Village Dot Com!

Message ID: 392101 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-17 15:56:00 Subject: We're at Investor Village Dot Com!!! Recs: 0 So, umm, kill the lights and lock up when you're done, OK? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Agressive bogosity!

Message ID: 391949 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-17 10:11:00 Subject: Agressive Bogosity! Recs: 0 I have been using this to get to a chronological list of at least a page worth of posts: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mb?s=SCOX Went there and noticed this subject line: "Link to the original msg board format" Elated at the prospect, I clicked the link and got: << Error: This message has been deleted>> Thanks, Y! moderator! Notice the posting volume has *plummeted*? I suspect the numbers won't look so sweet for advertisers after this fiasco! *gibber*! ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Board Unusable, Craptacular Tardware

Message ID: 391403 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-15 12:33:00 Subject: Board Unusable, Craptacular Tardware Recs: 0 Good Lord, this sucks! Words cannot express the sheer tardacity, the absolute suckitude of this format!!! What happened to the "return to original" link? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Syd Barret has died...

Message ID: 389672 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-11 16:30:00 Subject: Re: Syd Barret has died... Recs: 6 << But I think there actually WAS a ton of good music being made in the 80's. The problem was that a new "movement" was maturing but it was being completely ignored by the US music business.>> Oh, definitely. The whole undercurrent of punk and new wave was fine, but it wasn't anywhere near the radio. I can't recall ever hearing the Buzzcocks, Magazine, PIL, Jah Wobble, Bauhaus, Killing Joke, etc etc on the radio. And there was the 80s blues renaissance, including Stevie Ray Vaughn, one of my favorite guitar players. So yes, there was actually a lot of very good music made in the 80s. Unfortunately, from the perspective local radio, only the worst dreck ever got played. Also, I hate the f*ck out of MTV, which I will always associate with the 80s. << Maybe your friends didn't get as emotionally attache...

Re: Syd Barret has died...

Message ID: 389630 Posted By: peredurabefrog Posted On: 2006-07-11 15:01:00 Subject: Re: Syd Barret has died... Recs: 7 >> Have you seen this site? << No. I hadn't. Isn't the interweb a wonderful thing! I was right though. Didn't even make the handbills :) To be honest, I can't remember much about it, and I certainly never met any of the stars. As I recall we'd played a private party in Luton or somewhere the night before. Then we played a wedding on a farm nearby (in Lincolnshire, that is) - in a huge greenhouse I think - then we did Spalding and then belted up the motorway to do Manchester Students Union the following evening. I was the lead singer - so I was entirely out of it the whole time. Singers are supposed to do that, apparently. Well, that's my excuse and I've been using it for 30 years. Looking at the date, it seems as though I should have been doing my 2nd year exams at the time. Goodness only knows how (o...

Re: Syd Barret has died...

Message ID: 389628 Posted By: rex007can Posted On: 2006-07-11 14:58:00 Subject: Re: Syd Barret has died... Recs: 1 Wow, this is like, the most OT it can get, but here goes. << Just shows to go you how miserable the 80s were when a whole generation had to look backwards to find music worth listening to.>> IMO, if you weren't into hair bands or Dance Music in the 80's, AND if you didn't go looking into what was being done in the UK, yeah...it sucked. But I think there actually WAS a ton of good music being made in the 80's. The problem was that a new "movement" was maturing but it was being completely ignored by the US music business. Alternative rock music was already old and mainstream in the UK in the 80's. << I have received several calls today from people I haven't seen in a while over this.>> Yeah...I got a few emails too. << It is worth noting that none of these people called me when the guy from Nir...

Re: Syd Barret has died...

Message ID: 389610 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-11 14:20:00 Subject: Re: Syd Barret has died... Recs: 5 I was indoctrinated by older siblings. I remember my brother playing The Piper at the Gates of Dawn in his Zen Room with the quadrophonic speaker setup. I guess my friends and I were a bunch of anachronists, because they were all into the same thing. So there you have it: even a swaddling like myself at a tender 40 years of age had a Floyd soaked adolescence. Just shows to go you how miserable the 80s were when a whole generation had to look backwards to find music worth listening to. I have received several calls today from people I haven't seen in a while over this. It is worth noting that none of these people called me when the guy from Nirvana died. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user ...

Re: Syd Barret has died...

Message ID: 389586 Posted By: peredurabefrog Posted On: 2006-07-11 13:51:00 Subject: Re: Syd Barret has died... Recs: 3 And so has part of my youth. I played in a group on the same bill as Pink Floyd once. I think it was the (late unlamented) Spalding Rock Festival, or something, in perhaps 1967 or 1968. Jimi Hendrix was also in there somewhere, as I recall. The group I played with probably never even got onto the promotional literature, but it sounds good to say, "I played the same gig as Pink Floyd". But this was the '60s. So I could have this completely wrong. :) PAE ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "peredurabefrog" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Madcap's Last Laugh

Message ID: 389508 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-11 12:39:00 Subject: Re: Madcap's Last Laugh Recs: 8 << Syd Barret has died...>> << I thought some of the elder gentlemen of the board might be interested.>> Ouch! Syd was the soundtrack to many a sunrise back in the daze. Shine on you crazy diamond ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Alright, who's the asshat?

Message ID: 388824 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-07-10 09:38:00 Subject: Re: Alright, who's the asshat? Recs: 8 Salty: I have received the same warning letter several times over the years and none of those accounts got nuked. The one account I did lose got nuked without warning over (apparently) an innocuous post my mischievous wife wrote about Merkey. I have since posted far more provocative stupidity without any nukings. In each case where I got a warning from Yahoo, it was just some thumbsucker I flamed or who had some other grudge cravenly trying to get at my ankles from a safe distance. Don't worry about it. Instead, take solace in the utter lameness behind such a puny, desperate act. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:...

Alright, who's the asshat?

Message ID: 388808 Posted By: saltydogmn Posted On: 2006-07-10 08:49:00 Subject: Alright, who's the asshat? Recs: 14 I decided to check my belgianwaffle AT backinfullforce DOT com inbox this morning, just to see if there was any troll droppings there; instead, there was this; >>> From: Yahoo!< yahoo-dev-null@yahoo-inc.com> To: <belgianwaffle AT backinfullforce DOT com> Subject: Yahoo! Administrative Notice Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Dear Yahoo! account holder: By creating and using your Yahoo! account, you agree to abide by Yahoo!'s Terms of Service (TOS). Pursuant to the TOS, Yahoo! reserves the right to terminate your account or otherwise prohibit use of your account in the event that, among other things, Yahoo! believes that you have violated or acted inconsistently with the letter or spirit of the TOS. It has come to our attention that you may have violated the TOS. Please reread the TOS and cease any use...

Re: it's up on YSCOX now

Message ID: 384592 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-06-29 13:54:00 Subject: Re: it's up on YSCOX now Recs: 9 << Of course, I was just doing a search now on Y!SCOX and saw cdbaric trying to float his whole IPW was designed to be anti-GL meme a little earlier this month. And did I see mitmosnar out himself earlier today that he has been up to his multi-nym games still? I coulda sworn he gave that up a while back.>> Hey, Jeff! You display an amazing ability to conflate disparate elements into one retarded thesis! The Jones to Grokwar is strong in this one! Don't know if you've seen my expletive laden plea to leave me out of your little Grokwar renaissance. I hope you heed it. Meanwhile, I will confess my *heinous crimes* and throw myself to the mercy of the board!: Aside from my main nym, I am deeply ashamed to admit that I have others! I know: hard to believe, but it's *true*!!! I must bow my head in light of your moral purit...

It's all about screaming subject lines!

Message ID: 378899 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-06-09 12:44:00 Subject: IT'S ALL ABOUT SCREAMING SUBJECT LINES! Recs: 23 Just to add to your point: It's baldly obvious that deepdistrust merely wants his subject lines riddling the board. He rarely gives content a second thought, except to plant just enough hackneyed flame bait to get the responses he's angling for to get his subject lines promulgated. I suppose this is due to some moronic theory that casual passersby will scan the subject lines of this board, and then, without actually reading the posts, will make decisions based on the ones written in caps. The microscopic erosion this pointless fallacy is supposed to cause will eventually topple his perceived enemies. Yes, Zen does the same thing every morning, but there is a huge difference: Unlike our hapless wannabe, the Colonel provides useful information that backs up his subject lines, because he knows that people don't jus...

OT: Tedium Chronicles

Message ID: 372043 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-05-11 18:40:00 Subject: OT: Tedium Chronicles Recs: 39 Because I am faced with a tedious and time consuming job (modifying crappy contact/project management/reporting Access[blarf!] database), I thought a little procrastination was in order. So, having literally compared apples and oranges using Google's new "trends" search,I thought it would be equally pointless to look up sciBSD and Gadugi Linux, which, as it turns out, are terms that couldn't be graphed due to the fact that nobody has heard of or cares enough to have Googled them. My apathy piqued, I Googled sciBSD, and came across Wallace's web site: http://www.sci-bsd.com/ [*WARNING*: site utilizes seizure inducing BLINK tag! I'm not kidding!] Horrified, I noticed that the page is titled "Title of your page", so I thought, "Why not look at the source? It's not like I don't have a million better th...

Wow! DDT still a whiny l'il turd!

Message ID: 369681 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-05-03 10:19:00 Subject: Wow! DDT still a whiny l'il turd!!! Recs: 21 I deduced that li'l numb lobes was a gibbering retard *years ago*, yet, by the number of responses he's getting, I guess it is taking a while for that fact to sink in elsewhere. Here's how I dealt with the ankle biting little moron: I clicked the "ignore this user" link on the upper right hand corner of one of his typical text based drool paintings. Yes, it was that easy! So continue arguing with him if you must. Just bear in mind that you might as well be arguing with an inanimate object, plus attention is what the little turd craves, so you are being played like a xylophone should you choose to engage the mouthbreathing little troglodyte. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message...

Re: The Mythical Linux Security Trool

Message ID: 367122 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-04-25 13:06:00 Subject: Re: The Mythical Linux Security Trool Recs: 6 Guess what!?!: http://www.joeyfiasco.com/mp3/fever.mp3 !!! ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "timransom@rogers.com" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Re: OT: Yahoo and censorship

Message ID: 365846 Posted By: timransom@rogers.com Posted On: 2006-04-21 15:44:00 Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo and censorship Recs: 10 My experience has been that Y! account nuking is just random. I have received over half a dozen warnings over the years, none of which informed me of what exactly I had allegedly done to earn them (although in most cases the timing indicated disgruntled adversaries resorting to skullduggery in lieu of wit). My old mitmosnar nym racked up the bulk of them, but was never nuked. I have had one account nuked, and that one received no warning or explanation at all. The comment that appears to have caused the nuking was one my wiseacre wife posted wherein she mocked the M'OG PJ outing by suggesting that JVM "has a copy of Journey to Ixtlan in his back seat". Oddly, the rest of the thread remained, although the whole thing was devoted to listing JVM's many "crimes", such as taking more than 12 items to the express aisle ...